Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 320 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 6% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-10700F - 132 vs 124 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-10700F
- Up to 15% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - CA$439.97 vs CA$514.97
- Up to 9% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-11900K - CA$3.55 vs CA$3.90 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
132
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.9/FPS
91%
Price, CA$
CA$514.97
85%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$514.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 374 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
124
94%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.55/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$439.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$439.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 374 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-11900K | vs | Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |