Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-13400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-13400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 659 days older than the cheaper Core i5-13400F.
Advantages of Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 1% better in Resident Evil 4 than Core i5-13400F - 199 vs 198 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - CA$289.51 vs CA$570.89
- Up to 49% better value when playing Resident Evil 4 than Core i9-11900K - CA$1.46 vs CA$2.87 per FPS
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
199
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.87/FPS
51%
Price, CA$
CA$570.89
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$570.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
198
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.46/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$289.51
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$289.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-11900K | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |