Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11500 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11500 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F and the cheaper Core i5-11500 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 3% better in Valorant than Core i5-11500 - 861 vs 833 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11500 - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Core i5-11500
- Up to 7% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - CA$315.03 vs CA$336.99
- Up to 3% better value when playing Valorant than Core i9-11900F - CA$0.38 vs CA$0.39 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
861
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.39/FPS
97%
Price, CA$
CA$336.99
93%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$336.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 255 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
833
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.38/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$315.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$315.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 255 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-11900F | vs | Core i5-11500 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | No |