Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900 outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10850K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10850K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900 is 232 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10850K.
Advantages of Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 2% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i9-10850K - 164 vs 161 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-10850K
- Up to 24% cheaper than Core i9-11900 - CA$433.99 vs CA$567.92
- Up to 22% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i9-11900 - CA$2.70 vs CA$3.46 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900 - 20 vs 16 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
164
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.46/FPS
78%
Price, CA$
CA$567.92
76%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$567.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 352 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
161
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.7/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$433.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$433.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 352 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-11900 | vs | Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |