Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 104 days older than the more expensive Core i9-10900X.
Advantages of Core i9-10900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 3700X - 20 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-10900X - 192 vs 190 FPS
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i9-10900X - CA$199.73 vs CA$850.00
- Up to 77% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-10900X - CA$1.04 vs CA$4.47 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 65 vs 165 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for CA$850 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7076 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
192
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.04/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$199.73
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$199.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7076 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-10900X | vs | Ryzen 7 3700X |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |