Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 298 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3600.
Advantages of Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 1% better in F1 22 than Ryzen 5 3600 - 281 vs 279 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 20 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - CA$167.61 vs CA$400.00
- Up to 58% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i9-10900KF - CA$0.60 vs CA$1.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
281
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.42/FPS
42%
Price, CA$
CA$400
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$400 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7255 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
279
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.6/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$167.61
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$167.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7255 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-10900KF | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |