In Battlefield 6, the Core i9-10900KF is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-13900F and it's also a worse value for money, as it's only $91 cheaper!
Core i9-10900KF
- Up to 17% cheaper – $439.00 vs $530.07
- Up to 17% cheaper
Core i9-13900F
- Up to 41% faster in Battlefield 6 – 127 vs 90 FPS
- Up to 41% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 2 years and 8 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Apr 30, 2020
- Is 2 years and 8 months newer
- Up to 14% better value in Battlefield 6 – $4.17 vs $4.87/FPS
- Up to 14% better value in Battlefield 6
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i9-10900KF vs Core i9-13900F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-10900KF
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
90 FPS
71%
Min 1% FPS
67 FPS
71%
Price, $
$439
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.87/FPS
86%
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
127 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
95 FPS
100%
Price, $
$530.07
82%
Value, $/FPS
$4.17/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-10900KF vs Core i9-13900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-10900KF vs Core i9-13900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-10900KF
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
42%
L3 Cache
20 MB
56%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
95%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
52%
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
54%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-10900KF Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900F Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
$509.00 | MSRP | $524.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 125W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
