In Battlefield 6, the Core i9-10900 is quite a bit slower than the Core i7-14700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-10900
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-14700F
- Up to 42% faster in Battlefield 6 – 125 vs 88 FPS
- Up to 42% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 3 years and 8 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Apr 30, 2020
- Is 3 years and 8 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i9-10900 vs Core i7-14700F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-14700F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
125 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
94 FPS
100%
Price, $
$302.97
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.42/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-10900 vs Core i7-14700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-10900 vs Core i7-14700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-10900
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
50%
L3 Cache
20 MB
61%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
96%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
52%
Core i7-14700F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
33 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
75%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-10900 Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-14700F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| $483.00 | MSRP | $359.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
