In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-9700T is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-13900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-9700T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-13900F
- Up to 67% faster in Battlefield 6 – 127 vs 76 FPS
- Up to 67% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 3 years and 8 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Apr 23, 2019
- Is 3 years and 8 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-9700T vs Core i9-13900F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
127 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
95 FPS
100%
Price, $
$529.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.17/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-9700T vs Core i9-13900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-9700T vs Core i9-13900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-9700T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
33%
L3 Cache
12 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
77%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
48%
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-9700T Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900F Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
$323.00 | MSRP | $524.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
