Core i7-9700T vs Core i3-14100F in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
The Core i7-9700T is a much slower gaming CPU than the Core i3-14100F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i7-9700T
- Consumes up to 40% less energy – 35 vs 58 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Core i3-14100F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
The CPU's performance with selected game settings
Core i7-9700T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
203
89%
Min 1% FPS
139
90%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
227
100%
Min 1% FPS
155
100%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-9700T vs Core i3-14100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-9700T vs Core i3-14100F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-9700T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
57%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
91%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
56%
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-9700T | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100F |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
$323.00 | MSRP | $109.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 58 W |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 2666 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 4800 MHz |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | No |
No | Overclockable | No |