In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-9700K is slightly slower than the Ryzen 9 3900X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-9700K
- Consumes up to 10% less energy – 95 vs 105 Watts
- Consumes up to 10% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 9 3900X
- Up to 2% faster in Battlefield 6 – 87 vs 85 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 8 months and 17 days newer – Jul 07, 2019 vs Oct 19, 2018
- Is 8 months and 17 days newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-9700K vs Ryzen 9 3900X: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-9700K
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
85 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
64 FPS
98%
Price, $
$199.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.35/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-9700K vs Ryzen 9 3900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-9700K vs Ryzen 9 3900X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-9700K
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
8-core
67%
L3 Cache
12 MB
19%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
83%
Ryzen 9 3900X
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
94%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-9700K Oct 19th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 3900X Jul 7th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 19th, 2018 | Released | Jul 7th, 2019 |
$385.00 | MSRP | $499.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | AM4 |
95 W | Power Consumption | 105 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
