The Core i7-9700K is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-8120, however, it's the same value for money, as it's CA$277.98 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i7-9700K
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of the FX-8120
- Up to 76% cheaper – CA$87.02 vs CA$365.00
Core i7-9700K vs FX-8120 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-9700K
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
192
100%
Min 1% FPS
127
100%
Price, CA$
CA$365
23%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.9/FPS
27%
FX-8120
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
166
86%
Min 1% FPS
112
88%
Price, CA$
CA$87.02
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.52/FPS
100%
Core i7-9700K vs FX-8120 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-9700K vs FX-8120 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-9700K vs FX-8120 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-9700K
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
FX-8120
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
69%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-9700K | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
$385.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
95 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
Performance | ||
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.1 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.4 GHz |
12 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 2666 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |