The Core i7-920 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Ryzen 5 2600X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i7-920
The Ryzen 5 2600X is better in every way
Advantages of the Ryzen 5 2600X
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 27% less energy – 95 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 12 vs 8 threads
Core i7-920 vs Ryzen 5 2600X for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-920
Nov 17th, 2008
Average FPS
166
91%
Min 1% FPS
112
93%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Ryzen 5 2600X
Apr 19th, 2018
Average FPS
183
100%
Min 1% FPS
121
100%
Price, CA$
CA$115.12
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.62/FPS
100%
Core i7-920 vs Ryzen 5 2600X in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-920 vs Ryzen 5 2600X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-920 vs Ryzen 5 2600X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-920
Nov 17th, 2008
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.67 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
2.93 GHz
70%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 5 2600X
Apr 19th, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-920 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 5 2600X |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Not Available | MSRP | $229.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
130 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.2 GHz |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 16 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 2933 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | No |
No | Overclockable | Yes |