Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms Core i7-8809G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 1433 days newer than Core i7-8809G.
Advantages of Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 11% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-8809G - 146 vs 131 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-8809G - 12 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i7-8809G
Mobile • Feb 1st, 2018
Core i5-12400
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-8809G | vs | Core i5-12400 |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Kaby Lake G | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel BGA 2270 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| Radeon RX Vega M GH | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
