The Core i7-870 is a slower gaming CPU than the Celeron G4900. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i7-870
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of the Celeron G4900
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 43% less energy – 54 vs 95 Watts
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Core i7-870 cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Core i7-870 vs Celeron G4900 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-870
Sep 8th, 2009
Average FPS
167
98%
Min 1% FPS
113
99%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
Celeron G4900
Apr 3rd, 2018
Average FPS
170
100%
Min 1% FPS
114
100%
Price, CA$
CA$98.88
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.58/FPS
100%
Core i7-870 vs Celeron G4900 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-870 vs Celeron G4900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-870 vs Celeron G4900 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-870
Sep 8th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.93 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Celeron G4900
Apr 3rd, 2018
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-870 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Sep 8th, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Not Available | MSRP | $42.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Coffee Lake |
95 W | Power Consumption | 54 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.1 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 2 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |