Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10100 outperforms Core i7-840QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10100 is 3602 days newer than Core i7-840QM.
Advantages of Core i7-840QM
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than Intel Core i3-10100 - 45 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Core i3-10100
- Performs up to 11% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-840QM - 122 vs 110 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-840QM doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
122
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.07/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$130.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$130.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 356 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-840QM | vs | Core i3-10100 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 95 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |