In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-6950X is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-13900KS. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-6950X
- Consumes up to 7% less energy – 140 vs 150 Watts
- Consumes up to 7% less energy
Core i9-13900KS
- Up to 73% faster in Battlefield 6 – 137 vs 79 FPS
- Up to 73% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 6 years and 7 months newer – Jan 12, 2023 vs May 31, 2016
- Is 6 years and 7 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-6950X vs Core i9-13900KS: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-13900KS
Jan 12th, 2023
Average FPS
137 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
102 FPS
100%
Price, $
$751.89
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.48/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-6950X vs Core i9-13900KS in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-6950X vs Core i9-13900KS in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-6950X
May 31st, 2016
Cores
10-core
42%
L3 Cache
25 MB
69%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
58%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
43%
Core i9-13900KS
Jan 12th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-6950X May 31st, 2016 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900KS Jan 12th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 31st, 2016 | Released | Jan 12th, 2023 |
| $1,723.00 | MSRP | $699.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | LGA1700 |
140 W | Power Consumption | 150 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
