Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6900K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6900K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 2409 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6900K.
Advantages of Core i7-6900K
- Up to 58% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - CA$309.63 vs CA$743.19
- Up to 23% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - CA$2.06 vs CA$2.66 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 86% better in FIFA 23 than Core i7-6900K - 279 vs 150 FPS
- Consumes up to 14% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 120 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6900K - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
150
54%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.06/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$309.63
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$309.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6883 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
279
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.66/FPS
77%
Price, CA$
CA$743.19
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$743.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7158 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-6900K | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |