Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-6900K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 1132 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-6900K.
Advantages of Core i7-6900K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 2% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-6900K - 160 vs 157 FPS
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i7-6900K - CA$167.61 vs CA$309.63
- Up to 47% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-6900K - CA$1.05 vs CA$1.97 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 65 vs 140 Watts
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for CA$309.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7033 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
160
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.05/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$167.61
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$167.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7033 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-6900K | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |