Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-13400F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-6900K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-13400F is 2409 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-6900K.
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 9% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-6900K - 131 vs 120 FPS
- Up to 12% cheaper than Core i7-6900K - CA$271.20 vs CA$309.63
- Up to 20% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-6900K - CA$2.07 vs CA$2.58 per FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for CA$309.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7036 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
131
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.07/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$271.2
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$271.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7310 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-6900K | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
140 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |