Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 1892 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700T.
Advantages of Core i7-6700T
- Up to 65% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5950X - CA$173.74 vs CA$498.98
- Up to 61% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Ryzen 9 5950X - CA$0.43 vs CA$1.10 per FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 35 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 12% better in Battlefield IV than Core i7-6700T - 453 vs 404 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700T - 32 vs 8 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
404
89%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.43/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$173.74
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$173.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7316 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
453
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.1/FPS
39%
Price, CA$
CA$498.98
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$498.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7590 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-6700T | vs | Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Skylake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |