Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 2348 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700K.
Advantages of Core i7-6700K
- Up to 28% cheaper than Core i5-12400F - CA$253.79 vs CA$350.99
- Up to 24% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i5-12400F - CA$1.42 vs CA$1.86 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 6% better in Deathloop than Core i7-6700K - 189 vs 179 FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700K - 65 vs 91 Watts
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
FPS
179
95%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.42/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$253.79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$253.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1770 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
189
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.86/FPS
76%
Price, CA$
CA$350.99
72%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$350.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2044 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-6700K | vs | Core i5-12400F |
---|---|---|
Aug 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |