The Core i7-6700 is a slightly slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-10300H. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i7-6700
The Core i5-10300H is better in every way
Advantages of the Core i5-10300H
- A slightly faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 45 vs 65 Watts
Core i7-6700 vs Core i5-10300H for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-6700
Jul 1st, 2015
Average FPS
184
99%
Min 1% FPS
122
99%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
Core i5-10300H
Sep 17th, 2020
Average FPS
185
100%
Min 1% FPS
123
100%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
Core i7-6700 vs Core i5-10300H in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-6700 vs Core i5-10300H in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-6700 vs Core i5-10300H in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-6700
Jul 1st, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
89%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
73%
Core i5-10300H
Sep 17th, 2020
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-6700 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-10300H |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jul 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 17th, 2020 |
$303.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
65 W | Power Consumption | 45 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.5 GHz |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 @ 2133 MHz, DDR4 @ 2133 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 2933 MHz, DDR4 @ 2933 MHz |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics |
No | Overclockable | No |