The Core i7-640M is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Ryzen 3 3200G. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i7-640M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of the Ryzen 3 3200G
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
Core i7-640M vs Ryzen 3 3200G for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-640M
Sep 26th, 2010
Average FPS
167
93%
Min 1% FPS
112
94%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Ryzen 3 3200G
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
179
100%
Min 1% FPS
119
100%
Price, CA$
CA$127.24
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.71/FPS
100%
Core i7-640M vs Ryzen 3 3200G in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-640M vs Ryzen 3 3200G in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-640M vs Ryzen 3 3200G in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-640M
Sep 26th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
3.46 GHz
86%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
100%
Ryzen 3 3200G
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-640M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 3 3200G |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| $346.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
| Arrandale | Codename | Picasso |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.0 GHz |
| 4 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1066 MHz | RAM | DDR4 |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
