The Core i7-620LM is a slightly slower gaming CPU than the FX-8120. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i7-620LM
- Consumes up to 80% less energy – 25 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of the FX-8120
- A slightly faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Core i7-620LM vs FX-8120 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-620LM
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
166
100%
Min 1% FPS
112
100%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
FX-8120
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
166
100%
Min 1% FPS
112
100%
Price, CA$
CA$87.02
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.52/FPS
100%
Core i7-620LM vs FX-8120 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-620LM vs FX-8120 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-620LM vs FX-8120 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-620LM
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
65%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
82%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
100%
FX-8120
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-620LM | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-8120 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| $300.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Arrandale | Codename | Zambezi |
25 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.1 GHz |
| 2.8 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.4 GHz |
| 4 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1066 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
| HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
