Core i7-4940MX vs Core i3-9100F in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
The Core i7-4940MX is a slightly slower gaming CPU than the Core i3-9100F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i7-4940MX
- Consumes up to 12% less energy – 57 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Core i3-9100F
- A slightly faster CPU for gaming
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
The CPU's performance with selected game settings
Core i7-4940MX
Jan 20th, 2014
Average FPS
199
99%
Min 1% FPS
136
98%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
202
100%
Min 1% FPS
139
100%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4940MX vs Core i3-9100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4940MX vs Core i3-9100F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4940MX
Jan 20th, 2014
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
95%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
67%
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4940MX | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-9100F |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 20th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| $1,096.00 | MSRP | $122.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
57 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1600 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
