In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-4900MQ is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-13900K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4900MQ
- Consumes up to 62% less energy – 47 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 62% less energy
Core i9-13900K
- Up to 93% faster in Battlefield 6 – 133 vs 69 FPS
- Up to 93% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 9 years and 3 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Jun 02, 2013
- Is 9 years and 3 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-4900MQ vs Core i9-13900K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-13900K
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
133 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
100 FPS
100%
Price, $
$548.89
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.12/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4900MQ vs Core i9-13900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4900MQ vs Core i9-13900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4900MQ
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
93%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
66%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
29%
Core i9-13900K
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4900MQ Jun 2nd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900K Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
$570.00 | MSRP | $589.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG3 | Socket | LGA1700 |
47 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
