In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-4770K is slower than the Core i9-10900K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4770K
- Consumes up to 33% less energy – 84 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 33% less energy
Core i9-10900K
- Up to 25% faster in Battlefield 6 – 90 vs 72 FPS
- Up to 25% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 6 years and 10 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jun 02, 2013
- Is 6 years and 10 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-4770K vs Core i9-10900K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-4770K
Jun 2nd, 2013
Average FPS
72 FPS
80%
Min 1% FPS
54 FPS
79%
Price, $
$154.88
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.15/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4770K vs Core i9-10900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4770K vs Core i9-10900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4770K
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
8 MB
40%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
74%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
55%
Core i9-10900K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4770K Jun 2nd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10900K Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
$350.00 | MSRP | $547.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1200 |
84 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
