The Core i7-4750HQ is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-14900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i7-4750HQ
- Consumes up to 28% less energy – 47 vs 65 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Core i9-14900F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 8 threads
Core i7-4750HQ vs Core i9-14900F
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-4750HQ
May 27th, 2013
Average FPS
192
80%
Min 1% FPS
132
81%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
240
100%
Min 1% FPS
163
100%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4750HQ vs Core i9-14900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4750HQ vs Core i9-14900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4750HQ
May 27th, 2013
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
6 MB
17%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
55%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
29%
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-4750HQ | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-14900F |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 27th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $524.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
| Crystalwell | Codename | Raptor Lake-R |
47 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.0 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.8 GHz |
| 6 MB | L3 Cache | 36 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1600 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz |
Intel HD 5200 | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | No |
