Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms Core i7-4750HQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 3083 days newer than Core i7-4750HQ.
Advantages of Core i7-4750HQ
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 47 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 24% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-4750HQ - 203 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4750HQ - 24 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
203
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.21/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$449
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$449 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • May 27th, 2013
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-4750HQ | vs | Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
May 27th, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Crystal Well | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
47 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 5200 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |