The Core i7-4750HQ is a much slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-10900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i7-4750HQ
- Consumes up to 28% less energy – 47 vs 65 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Core i9-10900F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 20 vs 8 threads
Core i7-4750HQ vs Core i9-10900F
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-4750HQ
May 27th, 2013
Average FPS
192
92%
Min 1% FPS
132
92%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i9-10900F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
209
100%
Min 1% FPS
143
100%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4750HQ vs Core i9-10900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4750HQ vs Core i9-10900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4750HQ
May 27th, 2013
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
6 MB
30%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
62%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
55%
Core i9-10900F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-4750HQ | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 27th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $464.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
| Crystalwell | Codename | Comet Lake |
47 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 8 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.2 GHz |
| 6 MB | L3 Cache | 20 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1600 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2933 MHz |
Intel HD 5200 | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | No |
