In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-4610M is quite a bit slower than the Core i3-14100F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4610M
- Consumes up to 36% less energy – 37 vs 58 Watts
- Consumes up to 36% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i3-14100F
- Up to 59% faster in Battlefield 6 – 105 vs 66 FPS
- Up to 59% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 9 years and 11 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Feb 01, 2014
- Is 9 years and 11 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-4610M vs Core i3-14100F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
105 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
78 FPS
100%
Price, $
$96.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.92/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4610M vs Core i3-14100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4610M vs Core i3-14100F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4610M
Feb 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
79%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
33%
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4610M Feb 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 1st, 2014 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| $346.00 | MSRP | $109.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG3 | Socket | LGA1700 |
37 W | Power Consumption | 58 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
