In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-3970X is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-10900X. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $275 cheaper!
Core i7-3970X
- Up to 61% cheaper – $175.00 vs $449.98
- Up to 61% cheaper
- Up to 47% better value in Battlefield 6 – $2.82 vs $5.29/FPS
- Up to 47% better value in Battlefield 6
- Consumes up to 9% less energy – 150 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 9% less energy
Core i9-10900X
- Up to 37% faster in Battlefield 6 – 85 vs 62 FPS
- Up to 37% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 6 years and 11 months newer – Oct 19, 2019 vs Nov 01, 2012
- Is 6 years and 11 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-3970X vs Core i9-10900X: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-3970X
Nov 1st, 2012
Average FPS
62 FPS
73%
Min 1% FPS
47 FPS
73%
Price, $
$175
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.82/FPS
100%
Core i9-10900X
Oct 19th, 2019
Average FPS
85 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
64 FPS
100%
Price, $
$449.98
38%
Value, $/FPS
$5.29/FPS
53%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-3970X vs Core i9-10900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-3970X vs Core i9-10900X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-3970X
Nov 1st, 2012
Cores
6-core
60%
L3 Cache
15 MB
78%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
85%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Core i9-10900X
Oct 19th, 2019
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-3970X Nov 1st, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10900X Oct 19th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 1st, 2012 | Released | Oct 19th, 2019 |
| $990.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA2066 |
150 W | Power Consumption | 165 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR4 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
