Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3930K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3930K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 4069 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3930K.
Advantages of Core i7-3930K
- Up to 55% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - CA$500.00 vs CA$1099.99
- Up to 5% better value when playing War Thunder than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - CA$3.65 vs CA$3.86 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 108% better in War Thunder than Core i7-3930K - 285 vs 137 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Core i7-3930K - 120 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3930K - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3930K doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
FPS
137
48%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.65/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$500
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$500 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 167 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
285
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.86/FPS
95%
Price, CA$
CA$1099.99
45%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$1,099.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 167 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3930K | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Nov 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 120 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |