Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-11900K outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3930K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-11900K is 3410 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3930K.
Advantages of Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 61% better in Starfield than Core i7-3930K - 74 vs 46 FPS
- Up to 1% cheaper than Core i7-3930K - CA$494.81 vs CA$500.00
- Up to 38% better value when playing Starfield than Core i7-3930K - CA$6.69 vs CA$10.87 per FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-3930K - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3930K - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3930K doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$500 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 213 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
74
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6.69/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$494.81
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$494.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 221 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3930K | vs | Core i9-11900K |
---|---|---|
Nov 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |