In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-3930K is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-10900X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-3930K
- Consumes up to 21% less energy – 130 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 21% less energy
Core i9-10900X
- Up to 37% faster in Battlefield 6 – 85 vs 62 FPS
- Up to 37% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 7 years and 11 months newer – Oct 19, 2019 vs Nov 14, 2011
- Is 7 years and 11 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-3930K vs Core i9-10900X: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-10900X
Oct 19th, 2019
Average FPS
85 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
64 FPS
100%
Price, $
$449.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.29/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-3930K vs Core i9-10900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-3930K vs Core i9-10900X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-3930K
Nov 14th, 2011
Cores
6-core
60%
L3 Cache
12 MB
62%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
81%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Core i9-10900X
Oct 19th, 2019
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-3930K Nov 14th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10900X Oct 19th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 14th, 2011 | Released | Oct 19th, 2019 |
| $583.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA2066 |
130 W | Power Consumption | 165 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR4 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
