Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Core i7-3840QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 3431 days newer than Core i7-3840QM.
Advantages of Core i7-3840QM
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100F - 45 vs 58 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 21% better in Remnant II than Core i7-3840QM - 97 vs 80 FPS
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
97
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.12/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$109
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$109 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3840QM | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 58 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |