Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 4271 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770S.
Advantages of Core i7-3770S
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - CA$211.14 vs CA$470.92
- Up to 48% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-14700F - CA$1.64 vs CA$3.18 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 15% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-3770S - 148 vs 129 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770S - 28 vs 8 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
129
87%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.64/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$211.14
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$211.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7505 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
148
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.18/FPS
52%
Price, CA$
CA$470.92
44%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$470.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7505 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3770S | vs | Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 20 |
8 | Threads | 28 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |