Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 3902 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770S.
Advantages of Core i7-3770S
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - CA$132.38 vs CA$270.73
- Up to 43% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-13400F - CA$1.17 vs CA$2.07 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 16% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-3770S - 131 vs 113 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770S - 16 vs 8 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
113
86%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.17/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$132.38
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$132.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
131
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.07/FPS
57%
Price, CA$
CA$270.73
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$270.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3770S | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |