Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 4271 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770K.
Advantages of Core i7-3770K
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - CA$350.00 vs CA$508.14
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 45% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i7-3770K - 269 vs 185 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770K - 28 vs 8 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for CA$350 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 340 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
269
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.89/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$508.14
68%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$508.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 340 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3770K | vs | Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 20 |
8 | Threads | 28 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
77 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |