In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-3632QM is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-9900K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-3632QM
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
Core i9-9900K
- Up to 41% faster in Battlefield 6 – 86 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 41% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 5 years and 11 months newer – Oct 19, 2018 vs Oct 19, 2012
- Is 5 years and 11 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-3632QM vs Core i9-9900K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-9900K
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
86 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
64 FPS
100%
Price, $
$449
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.22/FPS
100%
![Intel Core i9 i9-9900K Octa-core [8 Core] 3.60 GHz Processor - Socket H4 LGA-1151 - Retail Pack](https://howmanyfps.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/static/cpus/B07KC6V4YF.jpg)
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-3632QM vs Core i9-9900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-3632QM vs Core i9-9900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-3632QM
Oct 19th, 2012
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
61%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
64%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-9900K
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-3632QM Oct 19th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-9900K Oct 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 19th, 2012 | Released | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| – | MSRP | $488.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
