Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms Core i7-3615QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 2625 days newer than Core i7-3615QM.
Advantages of Core i7-3615QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 2% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-3615QM - 171 vs 168 FPS
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
171
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.7/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$119.35
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$119.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 212 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3615QM | vs | Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |