In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-3612QM is much slower than the Core i9-14900. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-3612QM
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core i9-14900
- Up to 111% faster in Battlefield 6 – 129 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 111% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 11 years and 8 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Apr 29, 2012
- Is 11 years and 8 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-3612QM vs Core i9-14900: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-14900
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
129 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
97 FPS
100%
Price, $
$569.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.41/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-3612QM vs Core i9-14900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-3612QM vs Core i9-14900 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-3612QM
Apr 29th, 2012
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
6 MB
17%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.1 GHz
53%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-14900
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-3612QM Apr 29th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900 Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 29th, 2012 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $549.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
