In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-3610QM is quite a bit slower than the Ryzen 9 5950X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-3610QM
- Consumes up to 57% less energy – 45 vs 105 Watts
- Consumes up to 57% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 9 5950X
- Up to 70% faster in Battlefield 6 – 104 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 70% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 8 years and 6 months newer – Nov 05, 2020 vs Apr 23, 2012
- Is 8 years and 6 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-3610QM vs Ryzen 9 5950X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-3610QM vs Ryzen 9 5950X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-3610QM vs Ryzen 9 5950X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-3610QM
Apr 23rd, 2012
Cores
4-core
25%
L3 Cache
6 MB
9%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
68%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
67%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
50%
Ryzen 9 5950X
Nov 5th, 2020
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-3610QM Apr 23rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 5950X Nov 5th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 23rd, 2012 | Released | Nov 5th, 2020 |
$378.00 | MSRP | $799.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | AM4 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 105 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
