Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms Core i7-3610QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 3543 days newer than Core i7-3610QM.
Advantages of Core i7-3610QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i5-12400 - 45 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 46% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-3610QM - 658 vs 452 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3610QM - 12 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-3610QM
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2012
Core i5-12400
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3610QM | vs | Core i5-12400 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
