In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-3537U is slower than the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-3537U
- Consumes up to 91% less energy – 17 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 91% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 25% faster in Battlefield 6 – 76 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 25% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 5 years and 8 months newer – Oct 03, 2018 vs Jan 08, 2013
- Is 5 years and 8 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-3537U vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Oct 3rd, 2018
Average FPS
76 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
57 FPS
100%
Price, $
$229.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.02/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-3537U vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-3537U vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-3537U
Jan 8th, 2013
Cores
2-core
17%
L3 Cache
4 MB
12%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
57%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
74%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Oct 3rd, 2018
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-3537U Jan 8th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 2920X Oct 3rd, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
| – | MSRP | $649.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | SP3r2 |
17W | Power Consumption | 180W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
