In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-2860QM is much slower than the Ryzen 9 7900X3D. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-2860QM
- Consumes up to 62% less energy – 45 vs 120 Watts
- Consumes up to 62% less energy
Ryzen 9 7900X3D
- Up to 156% faster in Battlefield 6 – 159 vs 62 FPS
- Up to 156% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 11 years and 4 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Sep 04, 2011
- Is 11 years and 4 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-2860QM vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-2860QM vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-2860QM vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-2860QM
Sep 4th, 2011
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
8 MB
6%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
57%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
64%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 9 7900X3D
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-2860QM Sep 4th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 7900X3D Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 4th, 2011 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $599.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | AM5 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 3000 | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
