Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Core i7-2720QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 3594 days newer than Core i7-2720QM.
Advantages of Core i7-2720QM
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 45 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 12% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Core i7-2720QM - 230 vs 206 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2720QM - 24 vs 8 threads
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
230
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.64/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$377
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$377 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7662 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-2720QM | vs | Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |