The Core i7-2675QM is a slower gaming CPU than the FX-9590. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i7-2675QM
- Consumes up to 80% less energy – 45 vs 220 Watts
Advantages of the FX-9590
- A faster CPU for gaming
Core i7-2675QM vs FX-9590 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-2675QM
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
167
99%
Min 1% FPS
112
99%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
FX-9590
Jun 11th, 2013
Average FPS
169
100%
Min 1% FPS
113
100%
Price, CA$
CA$340
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.01/FPS
100%
Core i7-2675QM vs FX-9590 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-2675QM vs FX-9590 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-2675QM vs FX-9590 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-2675QM
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
47%
Turbo Frequency
3.1 GHz
62%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
FX-9590
Jun 11th, 2013
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-2675QM | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-9590 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
45 W | Power Consumption | 220 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Frequency | 4.7 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.0 GHz |
| 6 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | DDR3 @ 1866 MHz |
| Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
