Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Core i7-2635QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 4384 days newer than Core i7-2635QM.
Advantages of Core i7-2635QM
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 45 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 22% better in Valheim than Core i7-2635QM - 231 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2635QM - 32 vs 8 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
231
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.76/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$1099.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$1,099.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-2635QM | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 120 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |